Sensa People Intelligence

The AI People Scientist for your whole company.

Sensa is an intelligent employee listening system. It measures how your people feel and what's missing, reads it like a senior organisational psychologist, then hands every manager, HR lead and exec a plan for Monday morning.

See how it works
Sensa AI · People Scientist
LeadershipHRManager
Whole organisation · 986 responses · vs. last year
Reading 986 responses across 9 teams
F1F2F3F4F5F6F7F8F9F10
01
02
03
04
Do first
Prioritise systemic, organisation-wide interventions - leaders modelling candour moves safety faster than any local fix.
Illustrative output - every read is written from your own data
Running pilots with teams at
28 Stone
LG Electronics
Balcia Insurance
The Customization Group
The problem

Every time you ask your people how they're doing. Every year the answers sit in a spreadsheet.

The survey isn't the hard part. Acting on it is. The answers arrive as numbers nobody has time to turn into decisions, so the year passes with the same problems inside it - and the bill arrives later, in who leaves.

So the report gets built, presented once, and quietly filed. The teams that needed attention never get it, and next year you ask the same questions again.

The average looks fine
The team about to lose three people is hidden inside it, and nothing in the report points at them.
Managers get charts, not answers
A dashboard doesn't tell a manager what to say in their next team meeting.
Analysis eats weeks of HR
Cleaning the data, building the deck, chasing the follow-ups - before any of it helps anyone.
So you hear it at the exit interview
By the time someone explains why they're leaving, the decision was made months ago.

0% had no conversation about their job satisfaction in the three months before leaving. 0% of employees who quit say their manager or company could have prevented it.

Gallup, 42% of Employee Turnover Is Preventable but Often Ignored

The answer

So here's how Sensa runs it instead

A written read is ready the moment responses close, not weeks later
Every team gets its own analysis, named and ranked by risk
Each manager gets concrete actions in their own language
HR sees who has acted, and nudges the teams that haven't
Leaders see the same picture their managers do, one level up
People see what their answers changed, so they answer again
How it works

One loop, four moves.

The same four steps a good people scientist takes - run continuously, for every team, without weeks of manual work.

01
Measures
Ten validated dimensions, eNPS, stress and health.
02
Interprets
What moved, why, and in which teams.
03
Prescribes
What to fix first, and the actions to take.
04
Tracks
Every action through to done, and back to your people.
01Measures
See the whole organisation at a glance.
Pick a role - the whole product changes with it.
Sensa People
Company X · Engagement & Satisfaction at Work
2025
Export
JD
Organisation Health · Executive Summary
Where the organisation stands in 2025 and how it moved since 2024.
Trending up across all indices
eNPS
+32↑ +22
Net advocacy · vs 2024
44%
Prom.
44%
Pass.
12%
Detr.
Engagement Index
↑ +0.19
4.12out of 5.0
Healthy
F1–F5 · above the 4.0 target
Satisfaction Index
steady
4.05out of 5.0
Healthy
F6–F10 · above the 4.0 target
Employer Brand
steady
4.23out of 5.0
Healthy
Strong external perception
Stress Index
↓ -0.09
1.62out of 5.0
Healthy
Well below the 2.0 ceiling
Department Health · ranked by eNPS
DepartmentnWellb.eNPSEngage.Satisf.StressBrandStatus
Leadership Team54.65
+80
4.714.601.844.52
Thriving
Workplace Services123.93
+58
4.063.801.364.29
Watch
Legal & Compliance83.96
+50
4.093.821.984.44
Watch
People & Culture134.22
+46
4.124.321.554.24
Healthy
Platform Engineering244.20
+42
4.184.211.534.33
Healthy
Data & Analytics144.15
+36
4.164.131.574.30
Healthy
Client Support473.97
+23
4.013.931.624.06
Watch
Field Operations154.11
-20
4.243.981.774.25
Healthy

Field Operations is the outlier: healthy wellbeing, negative advocacy. A company average would have hidden it.

02Interprets
A plain-language read for every team.
Pick a team - every one of them gets its own written read.
Sensa AI · People Scientist
Field Operations · 15 responses · against the company mean
Engaged, but not advocating - Field Operations likes the work and each other, and still would not recommend the company.
01

eNPS -20 against a company +32, on an engagement index of 4.24 that is above the company.

02

Relationships with colleagues 5.00 - the highest single factor score anywhere in the company.

03

Fair compensation 3.45 and work-related emotions 3.72 are the two real shortfalls.

04

Stress 1.77 against 1.62, with unclear expectations rather than workload as the driver.

Focus

Run a pay-transparency session with Field Operations before the company-wide rollout, not after it.

Root cause

Goodwill is buffering a fairness problem: people stay for each other, not for the deal. A leading retention risk, not a lagging one. Confidence: moderate

What Predicts eNPSR² = 0.48

Strongest levers on employee advocacy.

i
Company support (F6)
0.19
Work-related emotions (F1)
0.16
Fair compensation (F10)
0.13
Manager support (F7)
0.09
Psychological safety (F8)
0.11
Internal communication (F9)
0.07

β is a standardized ridge weight: each factor's unique effect on eNPS holding the other nine constant. Amber marks a lever that is also below the 4.0 target - that is where gap meets influence.

03Prescribes
Know what to fix first.
Where to Focus

Field Operations is the only unit with negative advocacy (eNPS -20) despite otherwise healthy wellbeing.

Fair compensation (3.88) and psychological safety (3.79) are the two factors below target; pay transparency and everyday voice, not pay level.

Legal & Compliance carries the highest stress in the company (1.98) with internal communication at 2.10.

Client Support - the largest team at 47 people - sits just below the company average on wellbeing, so small gains there move the whole number.

Wins to Protect

eNPS rose from +10 to +32 as detractors fell from 25% to 12% of the workforce.

Internal communication (+0.31) and personal growth (+0.24) posted the largest factor gains year on year.

Manager support (4.38) and relationships with colleagues (4.24) are the two strongest factors in the company.

Action Priority Matrix · eNPS

Every factor by current score (x) and unique impact on eNPS (y). Top-left = fix first · psychological safety is weighted as foundational.

How it is calculated: X = the factor's company mean (1–5). Y = its standardized ridge β on eNPS - the factor's unique contribution holding the other nine constant. Below-target factors with high β land top-left; strong factors sit right.

target 4.0Current score →Unique impact on eNPS (β) →FIX FIRSTMONITORMAINTAINF1 EmotionF2 ColleaguesF3 GrowthF4 AutonomyF5 MeaningF6 Co. supportF7 ManagerF8 SafetyF9 CommsF10 Pay

Two factors land in the red quadrant. That is the shortlist - psychological safety and fair compensation. Everything to the right of the target line is already working.

04Tracks
Watch every team close the loop.
Nudge a stalled team - the reminder goes to their manager.
Manager Follow-up by Team3 of 8 teams fully closed the loop
TeamManagerReport seenDiscussion setDiscussedActionsProgressMeeting & nudge
Data & AnalyticsLīga Ozola
100%
Meeting set ✓Sent ✓
People & CultureIeva Zariņa
100%
Meeting set ✓Sent ✓
Leadership TeamMāris Krūmiņš
100%
Meeting set ✓Sent ✓
Platform EngineeringRoberts Vītols
75%
Meeting set ✓Sent ✓
Client SupportJānis Bērziņš
50%
Meeting set ✓Sent ✓
Legal & CompliancePēteris Kalns
50%
Meeting set ✓
Field OperationsAnna Liepa
25%
Plan meeting
Workplace ServicesDainis Eglītis
0%
Plan meeting

Each step is the manager's own self-report. Plan meeting books the team discussion; Nudge emails the manager a reminder. Nobody sees an individual answer at any point.

What a cycle looks like

One team, one read, one action, one number that moved.

None of this happens in the abstract. Here is a single cycle for a single team, from the moment responses close to the number that moved - the shape every team's cycle takes.

Illustrative: a sample cycle on sample data, not a customer result.

01
Responses close
Field team, 17 people. Engagement 3.88 against a company mean of 4.12, and psychological safety at 3.81.
02
The read, the same day
Not just a low bar on a chart: people are delivering, but not challenging each other out loud. Psychological safety is the driver with the largest measured effect on this team's advocacy.
03
The manager's plan
Three specific moves for their next two team meetings, written in their own language. They commit to two of them in the platform.
04
Next measurement
Psychological safety 3.81 to 4.19, team eNPS up 14. HR can see which action was taken, and when.
And straight back to 01 - the number that moved becomes the new baseline.
What we measure

Ten dimensions, three indices, plus the ones you add.

Engagement and satisfaction broken into factors you can act on - each benchmarked against last year and against the rest of the company.

F1
Work-related emotions
F2
Relationships with colleagues
F3
Personal growth
F4
Autonomy
F5
Meaningful work
F6
Company support
F7
Manager support
F8
Psychological safety
F9
Internal communication
F10
Fair compensation
eNPSEmployee advocacy and loyalty
StressStress-load index and top stressors
HealthPhysical and psycho-emotional health
+ YoursCustom questions and whole new dimensions on top of the core survey.
Open-endedFree-text answers read and themed automatically by the Sensa AI.
The roadmap

Engage is live. Pulse and Perform come next.

Available now
Next
Then
Sensa Engage
Everything on this page: the survey, the psychologist's read, ranked actions for every team and follow-through to done.
Sensa Pulse
Always-on check-ins between measurements, so a team sliding shows up in weeks rather than at the next annual survey.
Sensa Perform
Listening data tied to performance and goals, so how people feel sits next to the results it moves.
Who built it

Psychology and engineering.

Veronika Skorodihina
Veronika Skorodihina, MSc
Co-founder · Work and Organizational Psychologist
Organisational and leadership-development consultant, and Chair of the Board at the Latvian Society for Work and Organizational Psychologists - the expertise the AI is modelled on.
Philip Gaevsky
Philip Gaevsky
Co-founder · AI and Engineering
Engineering leader who builds products from scratch and ships production-ready AI, with a dual background in computer science and psychology.
The launch offer

Be one of the first 100.

We're inviting partners in order, ahead of the public launch. Early sign-ups get first pick of onboarding slots.

Your first full measurement and improvement cycle on the platform
Priority onboarding and setup with the Sensa team
Direct access to the founders and a real say in what we build next
First-partner pricing, locked in for as long as you stay
Rather just talk?hello@sensapeople.ai
Sensa People Intelligence
An AI People Scientist for your whole company - measuring, interpreting and following through.
© 2026 Sensa People · sensapeople.ai