Sensa People Intelligence
ProblemHow it worksWhat we measureTeam

The AI People Scientist for your whole company.

Sensa is an intelligent employee listening platform. It measures how your people feel and what's missing, reads it like a senior organisational psychologist, then hands every manager, HR lead and exec a plan for Monday morning.

See how it works
Sensa AI People Scientist
LeadershipHRManager
Whole organisation · 1,240 responses · vs. last year
Reading 1,240 responses across 8 teams
F1F2F3F4F5F6F7F8F9F10
01
02
03
04
Do first
Prioritise systemic, organisation-wide interventions - leaders modelling candour moves safety faster than any local fix.
Illustrative output - every read is written from your own data
Running pilots with teams at
28 Stone
LG Electronics
Balcia Insurance
The Customization Group
The problem

Every time you ask your people how they're doing. Every year the answers sit in a spreadsheet.

The survey isn't the hard part. Acting on it is. The answers arrive as numbers nobody has time to turn into decisions, so the year passes with the same problems inside it - and the bill arrives later, in who leaves.

The average looks fine
The team about to lose three people is hidden inside it, and nothing in the report points at them.
Managers get charts, not answers
A dashboard doesn't tell a manager what to say in their next team meeting.
Analysis eats weeks of HR
Cleaning the data, building the deck, chasing the follow-ups - before any of it helps anyone.
So you hear it at the exit interview
By the time someone explains why they're leaving, the decision was made months ago.

0% had no conversation about their job satisfaction in the three months before leaving. 0% of employees who quit say their manager or company could have prevented it.

Gallup, 42% of Employee Turnover Is Preventable but Often Ignored

The answer

So here's how Sensa runs it instead

Sensa AI
Leaders
Sales
Field Ops
Logistics
Every team ranked by risk - the same read their managers get
HR
✓Sales acted
✓Field Ops acted
Logistics - nudge sent
Who has acted, who needs a push
Managers
01Reset the on-call rota
02Name the Q3 priority
031:1s on workload
Concrete actions, in their own language
Your people
"Workload is unmanageable"
Two hires approved
Proof their answers changed something
How it works

One loop, four moves.

The same four steps a good people scientist takes - run continuously, for every team, without weeks of manual work.

Pick a role - the whole product changes with it.
Company X · Engagement & Satisfaction
2025 · 120 responses · 8 teams
eNPS
vs 2024
+40↑ +18
47% promoters · 7% detractors
Engagement
F1–F5 · target 4.0
4.20↑ +0.22
Healthy
Team health · by eNPS8 of 8 teams
Procurement+57Watch
Field Operations+35Watch
Sales-13Healthy

Executive Team, R&D, Legal & Compliance, Engineering and Logistics are all tracked on the same grid.

Sensa People
Company X · Engagement & Satisfaction at Work
2025
Export
JD
Organisation Health · Executive Summary
Where the organisation stands in 2025 and how it moved since 2024.
Trending up across all indices
eNPS
+40↑ +18
Net advocacy · vs 2024
47%
Prom.
46%
Pass.
7%
Detr.
Engagement Index
↑ +0.22
4.20out of 5.0
Healthy
F1–F5 · above the 4.0 target
Satisfaction Index
steady
4.07out of 5.0
Healthy
F6–F10 · above the 4.0 target
Employer Brand
steady
4.29out of 5.0
Healthy
Strong external perception
Stress Index
↓ -0.11
1.54out of 5.0
Healthy
Well below the 2.0 ceiling
Department Health · ranked by eNPS
DepartmentnWellb.eNPSEngage.Satisf.StressBrandStatus
Executive Team34.75
+100
4.834.672.024.60
Thriving
Logistics93.94
+67
4.133.751.304.38
Watch
Procurement93.95
+57
4.153.761.914.50
Watch
Legal & Compliance154.23
+56
4.184.271.484.31
Healthy
Engineering204.22
+56
4.254.201.484.41
Healthy
R&D104.19
+51
4.224.161.484.41
Healthy
Field Operations433.97
+35
4.073.871.544.15
Watch
Sales114.12
-13
4.303.941.694.32
Healthy

Sales is the outlier: healthy wellbeing, negative advocacy. A company average would have hidden it.

Pick a team - every one of them gets its own written read.
Sensa AI People Scientist
Sales · 11 responses · vs company mean
Engaged, but not advocating - Sales likes the work and each other, and still would not recommend the company.
01

eNPS -13 against a company +40, on an engagement index of 4.30 that is above the company.

02

Fair compensation 3.54 and work-related emotions 3.90 are the two real shortfalls.

Focus

Run a pay-transparency session with Sales before the company-wide rollout, not after it.

What predicts eNPSR² = 0.45
Company support
0.18
Work emotions
0.15
Fair compensation
0.12

Standardized ridge β - each factor's unique effect on eNPS holding the other nine constant. Amber marks a lever that is also below target.

Sensa AI People Scientist
Sales · 11 responses · against the company mean
Engaged, but not advocating - Sales likes the work and each other, and still would not recommend the company.
01

eNPS -13 against a company +40, on an engagement index of 4.30 that is above the company.

02

Relationships with colleagues 5.00 - the highest single factor score anywhere in the company.

03

Fair compensation 3.54 and work-related emotions 3.90 are the two real shortfalls.

04

Stress 1.69 against 1.54, with unclear expectations rather than workload as the driver.

Focus

Run a pay-transparency session with Sales before the company-wide rollout, not after it.

Root cause

Goodwill is buffering a fairness problem: people stay for each other, not for the deal. A leading retention risk, not a lagging one. Confidence: moderate

What Predicts eNPSR² = 0.45

Strongest levers on employee advocacy.

i
Company support (F6)
0.18
Work-related emotions (F1)
0.15
Fair compensation (F10)
0.12
Manager support (F7)
0.10
Psychological safety (F8)
0.10
Internal communication (F9)
0.08

β is a standardized ridge weight: each factor's unique effect on eNPS holding the other nine constant. Amber marks a lever that is also below the 4.0 target - that is where gap meets influence.

Action priority · eNPS

Every factor by current score against the 4.0 target, and its unique impact on eNPS. Below target with high impact gets fixed first.

Fix first
F8 Safety 3.85F10 Pay 3.87
Protect
F6 Co. supportF1 Emotions
Monitor
F9 Comms 3.97F3 Growth
Working
F2 ColleaguesF5 MeaningF7 Manager

Two factors land in the red quadrant. That is the shortlist - psychological safety and fair compensation.

Where to focus

Sales is the only unit with negative advocacy (eNPS -13) despite otherwise healthy wellbeing.

Fair compensation (3.87) and psychological safety (3.85) are the two factors below target; pay transparency and everyday voice, not pay level.

Wins to protect

eNPS rose from +22 to +40 as detractors fell from 19% to 7% of the workforce.

Manager support (4.45) and meaningful work (4.44) are the two strongest factors in the company.

Where to Focus

Sales is the only unit with negative advocacy (eNPS -13) despite otherwise healthy wellbeing.

Fair compensation (3.87) and psychological safety (3.85) are the two factors below target; pay transparency and everyday voice, not pay level.

Procurement carries the highest stress in the company (1.91) with internal communication at 2.00.

Field Operations - the largest team at 43 people - sits just below the company average on wellbeing, so small gains there move the whole number.

Wins to Protect

eNPS rose from +22 to +40 as detractors fell from 19% to 7% of the workforce.

Internal communication (+0.27) and personal growth (+0.29) posted the largest factor gains year on year.

Manager support (4.45) and meaningful work (4.44) are the two strongest factors in the company.

Action Priority Matrix · eNPS

Every factor by current score (x) and unique impact on eNPS (y). Top-left = fix first · psychological safety is weighted as foundational.

How it is calculated: X = the factor's company mean (1–5). Y = its standardized ridge β on eNPS - the factor's unique contribution holding the other nine constant. Below-target factors with high β land top-left; strong factors sit right.

target 4.0Current score →Unique impact on eNPS (β) →FIX FIRSTMONITORMAINTAINF1 EmotionF2 ColleaguesF3 GrowthF4 AutonomyF5 MeaningF6 Co. supportF7 ManagerF8 SafetyF9 CommsF10 Pay

Two factors land in the red quadrant. That is the shortlist - psychological safety and fair compensation. Everything to the right of the target line is already working.

Nudge a stalled team - the reminder goes to their manager.
Manager follow-up3 of 8 closed the loop
R&D
Claire Bennett
100%
Report seenDiscussion setDiscussedActions
Engineering
Robert Shaw
75%
Report seenDiscussion setDiscussedActions
Sales
Anna Whitfield
25%
Report seenDiscussion setDiscussedActions
Plan meeting

Logistics, Procurement, Field Operations, Executive Team and Legal & Compliance sit on the same board - every action tracked through to done.

Manager Follow-up by Team3 of 8 teams fully closed the loop
TeamManagerReport seenDiscussion setDiscussedActionsProgressMeeting & nudge
R&DClaire Bennett
100%
Meeting set ✓Sent ✓
Legal & ComplianceEmma Hayes
100%
Meeting set ✓Sent ✓
Executive TeamDaniel Reed
100%
Meeting set ✓Sent ✓
EngineeringRobert Shaw
75%
Meeting set ✓Sent ✓
Field OperationsJames Porter
50%
Meeting set ✓Sent ✓
ProcurementPeter Lane
50%
Meeting set ✓
SalesAnna Whitfield
25%
Plan meeting
LogisticsOwen Marsh
0%
Plan meeting

Each step is the manager's own self-report. Plan meeting books the team discussion; Nudge emails the manager a reminder. Nobody sees an individual answer at any point.

One team, one cycle

What it looks like when a number actually moves.

One team, one read, one action, one measurement later. Illustrative sample data, not a customer result.

Platform team14 people · measured twice
01The read
People deliver, but don't challenge each other out loud.
Engagement3.97
Psychological safety3.93
Vertical tick = company mean, 4.18
02The manager's plan
Three moves for their next two team meetings.
✓Open each meeting with an unresolved problem
✓Name one thing that went wrong, first
✓Rotate who runs the retro
Committed to two, in their own words
03Next measurement
4.28↑ +0.35
before
after
Psychological safety 3.93 → 4.28Team eNPS +11
HR sees which action was taken, and when
4.28 becomes the new baseline, and the next cycle starts from there.
What we measure

Ten dimensions, three indices, plus the ones you add.

Engagement and satisfaction broken into factors you can act on - each benchmarked against last year and against the rest of the company.

F1
Work-related emotions
F2
Relationships with colleagues
F3
Personal growth
F4
Autonomy
F5
Meaningful work
F6
Company support
F7
Manager support
F8
Psychological safety
F9
Internal communication
F10
Fair compensation
eNPSEmployee advocacy and loyalty
StressStress-load index and top stressors
HealthPhysical and psycho-emotional health
+ YoursCustom questions and whole new dimensions on top of the core survey.
Open-endedFree-text answers read and themed automatically by the Sensa AI.
The roadmap

Engage is live. Pulse and Perform come next.

Available now
Next
Then
Sensa Engage
Everything on this page: the survey, the psychologist's read, ranked actions for every team and follow-through to done.
Sensa Pulse
Always-on check-ins between measurements, so a team sliding shows up in weeks rather than at the next annual survey.
Sensa Perform
Listening data tied to performance and goals, so how people feel sits next to the results it moves.
Who built it

Psychology and engineering.

Veronika Skorodihina
Veronika Skorodihina, MSc
Co-founder · Work and Organizational Psychologist
Organisational and leadership-development consultant, and Chair of the Board at the Latvian Society for Work and Organizational Psychologists - the expertise the AI is modelled on.
Philip Gaevsky
Philip Gaevsky
Co-founder · AI and Engineering
Engineering leader who builds products from scratch and ships production-ready AI, with a dual background in computer science and psychology.
See it for yourself

See how Sensa works.

One of the founders shows you the product, live, in 30 minutes.

A full cycle end to end - how Sensa measures, reads the results and prescribes
What a manager, an HR lead and an exec each see when they log in
Where the questions come from, and why they're the right ones
Rather just email?hello@sensapeople.ai
Request a demo

A 30-minute walkthrough of the product with one of the founders.

Sensa People Intelligence
An AI People Scientist for your whole company - measuring, interpreting and following through.
© 2026 Sensa People · sensapeople.ai